The Copenhagen Project

Analysis: Monocle

The analysis of the print magazine Monocle looks like this:

Monocle Magazine
Organization
For-profit
Object
Original content
Presentation
Prioritized
Conversation
No conversation
Editing
Editors (Centralized)
Editor type
Human
Frequency
Regularly
Object provider
Editors

The above organization of the elements could be labeled ‘the archetype of commercial newspapers and magazines’. It’s exactly the same model as e.g. The New York Times (offline) and The Economist (offline). Still these three medias are different - and I believe the main difference in structural terms only lies in their different frequencies: Daily, weekly and monthly.

Our model could take this into account to illustrate this basic difference among medias. The options should then be something like: continuously, hourly (to account for e.g. radio news), daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, quarterly, yearly. But on the other hand, there’s so many different frequencies, that we can’t coin them all.

We have decided to go with continuously (no set interval) and regularly for now, but it’s interesting that time is what makes e.g. The Economist feel different than e.g. The New York Times in terms of media type (we are not too concerned about the specific content in this model).

Monocle Magazine has a web site, but the above analysis refers to the print magazine.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine

No Comments, Comment or Ping

Reply to “Analysis: Monocle”

Subscribe without commenting


We are building a catalog of media building bricks in order to reinvent the services we use to understand and keep up to date with what happens in the world. Read more...
Jeppe Kabell
Jeppe Kabell
Researcher
Thomas Madsen-Mygdal
Thomas Madsen-Mygdal
Instigator and sponsor